The whole ALAC structure is misconceived- April 29, 2003 From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhendersonxxxxxxxxxxxx> ------- As an individual internet user, I do not recognise ALAC's authority to organise on my behalf. I believe ALAC is a top-down invention, initiated by the ICANN Board, to protect its own interests. I believe an umbrella organisation for internet users should (and probably will) be set up outside ICANN, in order to operate critically and independently over issues concerning the DNS. The...http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00005.html Worldwide orgs- April 29, 2003 From: "Marc Schneiders" <marcxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ------- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 22:59:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc Schneiders <marcschneiders.org> To: alac-commentsicann.org Subject: Comment on Proposed Criteria etc. My comment is perhaps more a question: Where do organization that cover more than one region, esp. worldwide organizations, fit it Can they become an ALS In what region should they join the RALO Is there best way to have inputvote by applying for recognition as.http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00004.html (Fwd) ga On the ALAC's Request for Comments- April 27, 2003 From: "L. Gallegos" <jandlxxxxxxxxx> ------- Aside from a few explatives used, I must agree with Danny's assessment of the proposed plan. Further, if this is to be the position of ICANN regarding the ALAC, then there is still no credibility and no consensus in the community - none. As long as the public is exlcuded from meaningful participation in the election of directors, full membership and all rights thereof, the ALAC is meaningless. Leah Gallegos -------...http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00002.html Comments ALS and RALO- April 26, 2003 From: "YJ Park" <yjparkxxxxxxxxxxx> ------- From:YJ Park, Internet User, a member of ICANNatlarge.org To: ALACICANN Date: April. 22. 2003(Resend upon the request on April 27) Re: At-Large Structures, and Proposed Guidelines for Regional At-Large Organizations' (RALOs) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ICANN ------------------------------------------------------------------ I would like to thank ALAC members for offering comments from Internet users. I hereby provide...http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00001.html Openness of At Large Structures- April 25, 2003 From: "Bret Fausett" <fausettxxxxxxxxxxx> ------- Dear ALAC, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft "Proposed Criteria and Accreditation Process for At-Large Structures." I would like to suggest that the Committee consider deleting qualification 5 of the Proposed Minimum Criteria for an At Large Structure (which now reads: "Be open and participatory; open to individual constituents who meet their membership requirements and participatory in...http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00000.html Comments on "Proposed Criteria..."- April 23, 2003 From: "Karl Auerbach" <karlxxxxxxxxxxxx> ------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This message contains various items, all of which concern the "Proposed Criteria and Accreditation Process for At-Large Structures, and Proposed Guidelines for Regional At-Large Organizations' (RALOs) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with ICANN Draft for Public Comment 9 April 2003". First: Where is the public posting of the comments It appears that it has not been..http://forum.icann.org/alac-forum/criteria/msg00003.html |