Ten Reasons WhyUnclarifying the issues since 2000 (off and on)Post runs a correction on the RIAA article- January 8, 2008 The Washington Post got the message (if not from me, then from other sources with a wider audience), and published a correction to Marc Fisher's inaccurate story on Atlantic v. Howell. The correction reads:A Dec. 30 Style & Arts column incorrectly said that the recording industry "maintains that it is illegal for someone who has legally purchased a CD to transfer that music into his computer." In a copyright-infringement lawsuit, the industry's lawyer argued that the actions of an Arizona...http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/archives/2008/01/08/post_runs_a_correction_on_the_riaa... Wow. I got it right.- January 4, 2008 If I had any doubt that my interpretation of the RIAA's Atlantic v. Howell brief and the Washington Post's lousy reporting on the case was dead on, those have been washed away by William Patry, current Senior Copyright Counsel at Google and former copyright counsel to the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary. Patry also pretty much wrote the book on copyright, the "book" being a 7-volume, 5500-page treatise on copyright with a foreword by former Supreme Court Justice, Sandra Day..http://www.tenreasonswhy.com/weblog/archives/2008/01/03/wow_i_got_it_right.html |